| 000 | 06684 a2201297 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 8611 | ||
| 090 |
_98611 _a8611 |
||
| 100 | _a20140923 ukry50 | ||
| 200 |
_aChistian Doctrine, The external Prolegomena _fOuweneel, W.J. _eVakgroep Systematic Theology. Dogmatic theology 2 |
||
| 210 |
_aLeuven, Belgium _cBijbelinstituut Belgie v.z.w. _d1997 |
||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 102 | _aBE | ||
| 215 | _a298 pg. | ||
| 327 | _aContents | ||
| 327 | _a1. THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THEOLOGY -- pg. 1 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a1.1.1 Liberal and conservative theology -- pg. 1 | ||
| 327 | _a1.1.2 Suggestions for a sound meta-theology -- pg. 3 | ||
| 327 | _a1.1.3 Some counter-arguments -- pg. 5 | ||
| 327 | _a1.2 The dangers of scholasticism, biblicism, and humanism -- pg. 7 | ||
| 327 | _a1.2 The dangers of scholasticism, biblicism, and humanism -- pg. 7 | ||
| 327 | _a1.2.2 Biblicism, and irrationalism more generally -- pg. 11 | ||
| 327 | _a1.2.3 Humanism -- pg. 18 | ||
| 327 | _a1.3 A Christian-philosophical paradigm -- pg. 23 | ||
| 327 | _a1.3.1 Where do we find one? -- pg. 23 | ||
| 327 | _a1.3.2 Is a Christian theology at all possible or necessary? -- pg. 27 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a2.1 The fear of prolegomena -- pg. 36 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a2.1.2 The prolegomena in recent dogmatic works -- pg. 38 | ||
| 327 | _a2.2 What is theology? -- pg. 42 | ||
| 327 | _a2.2.1 A theological or a philosophical question? -- pg. 42 | ||
| 327 | _a2.2.2 Several definitions of theology -- pg. 45 | ||
| 327 | _a2.3 Practical faith vs. theoretical theology -- pg. 54 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a2.3.2 Differences and correspondences -- pg. 60 | ||
| 327 | _a2.4 The modal aspect of faith -- pg. 67 | ||
| 327 | _a2.4.1 The Gegenstand relationship -- pg. 67 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a3 THEOLOGY AND ITS RELATIONSHIPS -- pg. 86 | ||
| 327 | _a3.1 The relationship between theology and philosophy -- pg. 86 | ||
| 327 | _a3.1.1 Historical backgrounds -- pg. 86 | ||
| 327 | _a3.1.2 The necessity of Christian-philosophical foundations -- pg. 93 | ||
| 327 | _a3.1.3 The views of Brunner and Barth -- pg. 95 | ||
| 327 | _a3.2 The relationship between theology and the other sciences -- pg. 99 | ||
| 327 | _a3.2.1 Natural and supranatural theology -- pg. 99 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a3.3 The relationship between theology and confession -- pg. 105 | ||
| 327 | _a3.3.1 Dogmatics and the church -- pg. 105 | ||
| 327 | _a3.3.2 The meaning of dogma -- pg. 108 | ||
| 327 | _a3.3.3 Reformational and Evangelical considerations -- pg. 110 | ||
| 327 | _a3.3.4 Is dogmatics bound to creeds? -- pg. 114 | ||
| 327 | _a3.3.5 Again: practical faith vs. theoretical theology -- pg. 118 | ||
| 327 | _a4. THEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY -- pg. 128 | ||
| 327 | _a4.1 Analysis -- pg. 128 | ||
| 327 | _a4.1.1 Abstraction: its general nature -- pg. 128 | ||
| 327 | _a4.1.2 Substantialism -- pg. 131 | ||
| 327 | _a4.1.3 Practical faith and theological analysis -- pg. 134 | ||
| 327 | _a4.1.4 Systematic-theological abstraction -- pg. 137 | ||
| 327 | _a4.2 Concepts, ideas, metaphors -- pg. 140 | ||
| 327 | _a4.2.1 Theological concepts -- pg. 140 | ||
| 327 | _a4.2.2 Theological ideas -- pg. 145 | ||
| 327 | _a4.2.3 Theological metaphors -- pg. 150 | ||
| 327 | _a4.2.4 Root-metaphors -- pg. 154 | ||
| 327 | _a4.3 Theological criteria -- pg. 157 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a4.3.2 Modal criteria for theology -- pg. 160 | ||
| 327 | _a4.3.3 Systematization -- pg. 167 | ||
| 327 | _a4.4 Faith and reason -- pg. 171 | ||
| 327 | _a4.4.1 Analogies in the pistical modality -- pg. 171 | ||
| 327 | _a4.4.2 The logical in the pistical -- pg. 175 | ||
| 327 | _a5. THEOLOGICAL PARADIGMS -- pg. 184 | ||
| 327 | _a5.1 The concept of paradigm -- pg. 184 | ||
| 327 | _a5.1.1 Kuhn on paradigms -- pg. 184 | ||
| 327 | _a5.1.2 A Christian-philosophical paradigm -- pg. 187 | ||
| 327 | _a5.1.3 Ground-motive and dogmatism -- pg. 191 | ||
| 327 | _a5.2 Systematic-theological paradigms -- pg. 194 | ||
| 327 | _a5.2.1 The doctrine of the religious ground-motives -- pg. 194 | ||
| 327 | _a5.2.2 Three general paradigms -- pg. 197 | ||
| 327 | _a5.2.3 Scientistic (sub)paradigms -- pg. 200 | ||
| 327 | _a5.3 Bibliotropic (sub)paradigms -- pg. 209 | ||
| 327 | _a5.3.1 The classical-Reformational and the Evangelical paradigm -- pg. 209 | ||
| 327 | _a5.3.2 A closer comparison -- pg. 213 | ||
| 327 | _a5.3.3 A confrontation of paradigms -- pg. 216 | ||
| 327 | _a5.3.4 An example: Jonker on the covenant -- pg. 219 | ||
| 327 | _a6. THEOLOGICAL THEORY FORMATION AND TRUTH -- pg. 228 | ||
| 327 | _a6.1 The concept of truth -- pg. 228 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a6.1.2 The Biblical notion of truth -- pg. 233 | ||
| 327 | _a6.1.3 The theoretical concept of truth -- pg. 237 | ||
| 327 | _a6.2 Scientific truth -- pg. 243 | ||
| 327 | _a6.2.1 Realism and instrumentalism -- pg. 243 | ||
| 327 | _a6.2.2 The conflict in recent times -- pg. 245 | ||
| 327 | _a6.2.3 Present-day realism -- pg. 248 | ||
| 327 | _a6.3 Theological truth -- pg. 252 | ||
| 327 | _a6.3.1 Again: practical and theoretical thought -- pg. 252 | ||
| 327 | _a6.3.2 The subject-object relationship -- pg. 256 | ||
| 327 | _a6.4 Supra-theological truth -- pg. 261 | ||
| 327 | _a6.4.1 Rational and supra-rational truth -- pg. 261 | ||
| 327 | _a6.4.2 The fulness of Truth -- pg. 264 | ||
| 327 | _a | ||
| 327 | _a7. SUMMARY -- pg. 272 | ||
| 327 | _a8. BIBLIOGRAPHY -- pg. 276 | ||
| 330 | _aThis second edition of "Christian Doctrine: The External Prolegomena" is published as a Syllabus for the students of the European School of Evangelical Theology, Heverlee (Belgium), with kind permission of the first editions publisher: Buijten and Schipperheijn, Amsterdam (Netherlands). | ||
| 606 | _aTheology, Doctrinal. | ||
| 606 | _aPhilosophy, Scholasticism, biblicism, humanism. | ||
| 686 |
_2udc _a230 / Ouw / 1997 |
||
| 801 |
_aUA _b |
||
| 700 |
_aOuweneel _bW.J. |
||
| 942 | 0 | 0 |
_00 _cBOOK _n0 |